Author: Great Britain Courts
Publisher: Rarebooksclub.com
ISBN: 9781130668230
Size: 37.73 MB
Format: PDF, Kindle
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 1036
View: 528
Get Book
by Great Britain Courts, The Law Times Reports Volume 19 Containing All The Cases Argued And Determined In The House Of Lords Etc Together With A Selection Of Cases Of Universal Application Decided In The Superior Courts In Ireland And In Scotland Books available in PDF, EPUB, Mobi Format. Download
The Law Times Reports Volume 19 Containing All The Cases Argued And Determined In The House Of Lords Etc Together With A Selection Of Cases Of Universal Application Decided In The Superior Courts In Ireland And In Scotland books, This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1869 Excerpt: ...decreed. Druce, Q. C. and Langworthy, for the plaintiffs, in support of the bill, contended that the court had now this jurisdiction. Marlineau, for the defendants opposing a sale. The Vice-chancellor said that, in his opinion, the 4th section of the Act was retrospsctive, and that the court should be satisfied, before directing a decree for a sale of the land as prayed, .that such sale would not be injurious to the interests of the parties interested in the lands, and that the defendants, who by their answer had objected to a sale, should have an opportunity ot filing affidavits to show that such sale would be injurious to them. The cause would therefore stand over for a fortnight to enable those defendants to file such affidavits. The costs of the suit to abide the result. Order accordingly. Solicitors: J. Wilkinson; Emmet, Watson, and i ief. (Common lata (Courts. COTJBT OF aUEEN'S BENCH. Reported by T. Saunders and J. Siiobtt, Esqrs., Barristerial-Law. Nov. 19 and 21. Wason i). Walter. Libel--Privileged publication--Publication of reports 4 of Parliamentary debates--Members speeches--Newspaper criticism on the conduct of individuals. The publication of a full and faithful report of a debate in either House of Parliament is privileged, and an action for libel cannot be maintained against the publisher, although the speeches contain matter defamatory of an individual. The grounds on which exemption from legal liability is extended to the publication of the proceedings of courts of justice, apply equally to the publication of proceedings in Parliament, viz., (1) that the prima facie presumption of malice is rebutted by the occasion of publication, and (2) that the advantage to the general public resulting from publication, counterbalances th...
